Skip to content
CRIMINAL JUSTICE✓ Common Ground

Prohibit the use of chokeholds

78%National
70%Republican
86%Democrat
16%Gap
There is much controversy about police officers using chokeholds and other restraints that block the flow of blood or oxygen to the brain. These methods were the causes of the deaths of Eric Garner and George Floyd. A proposal in Congress would require states to prohibit the use of chokeholds and similar restraints as a condition of receiving federal funding.

Arguments For & Against

Pro Argument

There are means to restrain a struggling suspect without using dangerous methods that unnecessarily put the suspect's life in danger. Chokeholds by police have led to needless deaths of too many civilians as well as caused brain damage and strokes in others. Furthermore, when a suspect is being choked, they resist because they are trying to breathe, which is then used to justify using more force, including deadly force. Many police departments already prohibit chokeholds because they know it is wrong. They should be banned everywhere.

Con Argument

Officers are often dealing with violent, out-of-control people and they need all the tools available to them. If they cannot use chokeholds and similar restraints, they will have to use alternatives, like firearms, which are even more dangerous. Officers should not be denied these options as they may be needed in some circumstances.

Source document: PoliceReformQuaire0720.pdf

TypeOrganizationDateNatRepDemGapMetric
New PPC Survey (2026)Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 202678%70%86%16%favor
Deliberative SurveyProgram for Public ConsultationJuly 202073%55%91%36%favor

Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 2026

Prohibit the use of chokeholds that prevent breathing or block the flow of blood or oxygen to the brain.

Program for Public ConsultationJuly 2020

Require states to prohibit the use of chokeholds and other restraints that prevent breathing or block the flow of blood or oxygen to the brain.