Skip to content
IMMIGRATION✓ Common Ground

Hire more immigration court judges and staff to speed up asylum cases

76%National
73%Republican
83%Democrat
10%Gap
Under US and international law, people fleeing persecution can request asylum in the US. There is now a backlog of millions of asylum cases, with waits of years. Many asylum seekers are released into the US while waiting. Proposals would speed up case processing by increasing immigration judges, setting timelines, and creating more efficient procedures.

Arguments For & Against

Pro Argument

The asylum system is overwhelmed and broken. Cases must be decided quickly and fairly. Speeding up the process deters people from filing weak claims just to get into the country, while ensuring people with genuine fears of persecution get a timely decision. A functioning system restores rule of law.

Con Argument

Speeding up the asylum process risks denying protection to people with legitimate fears of persecution. Asylum cases are complex, and asylum seekers often need time to find legal representation and gather evidence. Imposing strict time limits could lead to wrongful denials and violations of international law.

Source document: Immigration_Quaire_Full_1024.pdf

TypeOrganizationDateNatRepDemGapMetric
New PPC Survey (2026)Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 202676%73%83%10%favor
Deliberative SurveyDeliberative Democracy LabSeptember 201993%90%96%6%favor

Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 2026

Hire several hundred more asylum judges and staff to significantly speed up the process of evaluating claims for asylum.

Deliberative Democracy LabSeptember 2019

Increase personnel to process asylum seekers' claims faster.