Skip to content
CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM✓ Common Ground

Continue the restrictions on non-profit organizations' political activity

79%National
80%Republican
80%Democrat
0%Gap
Current law (the Johnson Amendment) prohibits nonprofit organizations, including churches, from endorsing political candidates or engaging in partisan political activity, as a condition of maintaining their tax-exempt status. A proposal to repeal this restriction has been debated. This entry reflects support for keeping the existing restrictions in place.

Arguments For & Against

Pro Argument

Tax-exempt organizations exist to serve the common good — not to engage in partisan politics. Political activity by these organizations would effectively mean taxpayers are subsidizing partisan campaigns. Houses of worship and universities should not become venues where people feel pressured to vote for particular candidates.

Con Argument

Religious leaders and nonprofit heads have important perspectives on moral and civic issues. The government should not muzzle their free speech by threatening their tax-exempt status if they endorse candidates.

Source document: Johnson_Amendment_Quaire1117.pdf

TypeOrganizationDateNatRepDemGapMetric
New PPC Survey (2026)Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 202679%80%80%0%favor
Deliberative SurveyProgram for Public ConsultationNovember 201779%71%88%17%other

Program for Public ConsultationFebruary 2026

Continuing to prohibit non-profits that receive tax-deductible donations, such as churches and universities, from endorsing and providing financial support to political candidates.

Program for Public ConsultationNovember 2017

Change current law and allow tax-exempt organizations to endorse political candidates and provide them money and other support, while keeping the organization's tax-exempt status.